Contributor
Linda Darling-Hammond, Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education, Stanford University

Related Link:
http://edpolicy.stanford.edu/
Biography provided by participant
Linda Darling-Hammond is Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education at Stanford University where she has launched the Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education and the School Redesign Network and served as faculty sponsor for the Stanford Teacher Education Program. She is a former president of the American Educational Research Association and member of the National Academy of Education. Her research, teaching, and policy work focus on issues of school restructuring, teacher quality and educational equity. From 1994-2001, she served as executive director of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, a blue-ribbon panel whose 1996 report, What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future, led to sweeping policy changes affecting teaching and teacher education. In 2006, this report was named one of the most influential affecting U.S. education and Darling-Hammond was named one of the nation's ten most influential people affecting educational policy over the last decade. She recently served as the leader of President Barack Obama's education policy transition team.
Among Darling-Hammond's more than 300 publications are Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to Do (with John Bransford, for the National Academy of Education, winner of the Pomeroy Award from AACTE), Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs (Jossey-Bass: 2006); Teaching as the Learning Profession (Jossey-Bass: 1999) (co-edited with Gary Sykes), which received the National Staff Development Council's Outstanding Book Award for 2000; and The Right to Learn, recipient of the American Educational Research Association's Outstanding Book Award for 1998.
Recent Responses
September 28, 2009 08:31 AM
That our national troubles with high school graduation are increasingly in the news is critically important. We should all be disturbed by the latest data from the Alliance for Excellent Education documenting the enormous negative economic impact of the dropout crisis. By some estimates, dropouts cost the nation $200 - $300 billion annually in lost wages and taxes, as well as criminal justice and social service costs. A report just released in California noted that high school dropouts, who are unable to access jobs in the increasingly high-tech economy, cost the state $1.1 billion annually in costs of juvenile crime alone. Author Russell Rumberger…
Read moreSeptember 15, 2009 07:26 AM
To compete in a world that relies increasingly on knowledge work, college completion rates can and must be improved. For some time, the wages and opportunities of those with higher levels of education have been pulling ahead of those of high school graduates, that, today, barely enable subsistence. Yet, despite all of our investments in high school reform, only about 50 percent of 9th graders enter postsecondary education, and only about 35% graduate with a college degree – about half the rate of countries like Finland and Korea that have been intensely reforming their education systems. Earlier this year, President…
Read moreSeptember 4, 2009 03:25 PM
For decades now, we have approached education reform as a school-by-school endeavor, adopting policies, setting goals, and celebrating successes based on short-term gains at isolated buildings or in specific classrooms. If our ultimate goal is to improve public education in the United States, we cannot be satisfied with simply changing single schools. While they are to be celebrated and studied wherever they occur, incremental changes just are not enough, particularly if our long-term strategy is improved student achievement for all children. For every school that is transformed, there are several more that lack the monetary resources, leadership, and teaching capacity to improve. Studies…
Read moreAugust 27, 2009 09:52 PM
Among my fondest memories of Senator Ted Kennedy are recollections of his keen attention whenever he heard an idea that he thought might improve education and transform children’s life opportunities, particularly for our most vulnerable students. Whether in private meetings or Senate hearings, he would fix that that intense gaze on you and lean forward with a contagious sense of urgency to learn everything possible about what might be possible to move the learning agenda forward. He would take in information at the speed of light, asking insightful questions that revealed the wealth of knowledge he had assembled over many years of…
Read moreAugust 6, 2009 03:23 PM
When the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) long-term achievement trends came out earlier this year, they verified that the gap between white 13-years olds and their black and Hispanic counterparts had actually grown between 1990 and 2007 on the NAEP in both reading and math. Furthermore, the gap widens as students progress through school – growing from 39 points for African American 13-year olds in comparison to their white peers to 53 points for the subset of African American 17-year olds who are still in school. Graduation rate statistics suggest this is only about half of the cohort of…
Read moreJuly 24, 2009 06:48 AM
Concerns of districts “spinning” student performance data are increasingly widespread as high-stakes tests take center stage in U.S. accountability systems. Having an independent auditor or inspector to evaluate such data is not a bad idea, but by itself, it’s not likely to accomplish much to improve school systems. An auditing agency that looks only at test scores is a very partial vision of the kind of school evaluations that would actually move us forward in improving instruction. To secure a broader analysis of what and how schools are doing – and what will help them improve -- we should look…
Read moreJuly 9, 2009 07:30 AM
Too often U.S. debates about education focus more on issues of governance than educational substance. The issue of mayoral control is one example; others include the search for silver bullets through governance shifts like centralization – or decentralization (a recurrent theme in big cities), charters (vs. district-run schools), or national (vs. state or local) standards. All of these ideas can offer potential gains under the right circumstances and pitfalls under the wrong ones. Unfortunately, the never-ending debates about governance often deflect us from more important considerations of educational quality: What kind of learning and teaching are pursued, how capacity for…
Read more
About This Blog
This Education Blog is funded by support provided, in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for the purpose of creating an educational forum for sharing research, ideas and opinions regarding issues related to college readiness and college completion. The Blog may not be used to post partisan political statements supporting or opposing candidates for public office. All statements and materials posted on the Blog, including any statements regarding specific legislation, reflect the views of the individual contributors and do not reflect the views of National Journal or the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation. National Journal and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation take no positions regarding any legislation discussed in the Blog. National Journal reserves the right to monitor material placed on this site and to remove any posting they may deem inappropriate.